King County Navigation Bar (text navigation at bottom) 

Auditor's Office
 
King County Code Chapter 2.20
County Auditor

Sections:

2.20.005 Audit office established.
2.20.010 Appointment.
2.20.015 Auditor selection process.
2.20.020 Qualifications.
2.20.030 Term of office.
2.20.035 Types of audits.
2.20.037 Law enforcement audits.
2.20.040 Scope of authority.
2.20.042 Audit standards and quality assurance.
2.20.045 Audit work program.
2.20.050 Reporting of formal audits.
2.20.055 Performance measurement and reporting.
2.20.070 Violation enjoinment.
2.20.080 Staff.

2.20.005 Audit office established. There is hereby established within the legislative branch, pursuant to Section 250 of the King County charter, the county audit office. The organization and administration of the audit office shall be sufficiently independent to assure that no interference or influence external to the office shall adversely affect an independent and objective judgment by the auditor. The office shall be generally responsible for assisting the county council in its oversight function through the conduct of performance and financial audits and special studies of county agencies under the directorship of the county auditor. The office shall be provided a discrete budget and staffing allowance. (Ord. 15241 § 1, 2005: Ord. 8264 § 1, 1987).

2.20.010 Appointment. The King County auditor shall be appointed by a majority of the council following a selection and screening process as herein described. (Ord. 8264 § 2, 1987: Ord. 394 § 1, 1970).

2.20.015 Auditor selection process.

A. The selection process shall include at a minimum the following:

1. Review and update of the auditor’s job classification description, if necessary;
2. Advertise the availability of the position;
3. Establishment of an ad hoc auditor screening committee responsible for the screening and preliminary interviewing of candidates; and
4. Final interview and selection of appointee by the council.

B. The auditor screening committee shall be composed of five members appointed by the council and selected as follows:

1. Two members from a private sector accounting firm or a nonprofit organization with experience in performance auditing or program evaluation, and may include certified public accountants with a financial auditing background;
2. Two members from government agencies with experience in performance auditing or program evaluation;
3. One member who is a non-elected, nonpartisan member of the legislative branch; and
4. At least two out of the five members of the screening committee shall have management and supervisory experience, at least two out of the five members shall have governmental performance auditing experience and one shall have governmental financial management experience.

C. The screening committee shall screen, interview and score applicants for the auditor position, making a slate of the top ranking candidates for the council’s consideration. At the council’s discretion, the committee may also be formed to make recommendations to the council on any decision to reappoint the auditor. (Ord. 15241 § 2, 2005: Ord. 8264 § 3, 1987).

2.20.020 Qualifications. The auditor selected shall be a person able to analyze problems of performance, program operations, financial management and administration, internal controls and public policy and shall not be actively involved in partisan affairs. (Ord. 15241 § 3, 2005: Ord. 394 § 2, 1970).

2.20.030 Term of office. The auditor shall serve a term of four years, or for a specified period less than four years which shall be set by the majority of the council at the time of appointment, unless removed for cause at any time by vote of two-thirds majority of the council, and shall be reconsidered for reappointment at the end of the term of office. (Ord. 3455 § 1, 1977: Ord. 394 § 3, 1970).

2.20.035 Types of audits. The auditor, as a minimum, shall be responsible for performing the following types of audits:

A. Performance audits, which are an independent assessment of the performance of an agency or program based on objective criteria including best practices. It may evaluate an agency's or program's efficiency, effectiveness, economy, management controls or compliance with legislative intent and agency or program objectives;

B. Financial audits, which may include determining whether financial information is properly presented, internal controls for financial data are adequate, assets are safeguarded and financial compliance requirements are met; and

C. Special studies, which may encompass oversight, monitoring, cost-benefit analyses or other reviews with a unique scope, and may also include evaluation of program efficiency or effectiveness. (Ord. 15241 § 4, 2005: Ord. 8264 § 4, 1987).

2.20.037 Law enforcement audits.

A. The auditor shall establish a permanent ongoing law enforcement audit process.

B. The auditor shall acquire an outside law enforcement expert to conduct an initial audit of the sheriff's office internal investigation operations and practices and subsequently thereafter provide for periodic review of the sheriff's office. These reviews should include at a minimum an annual written report to the council.

C. The auditor shall assess and review reports and recommendations from the office of law enforcement oversight that provide council-directed oversight of the sheriff's office internal investigation unit. The auditor shall also review the effectiveness of the office of law enforcement oversight and make recommendations for reform when necessary.

D. The sheriff's office shall send any audits and reports produced under the sheriff's authority on investigation and complaint operations and performance to the King County auditor's office. The reports shall be transmitted in a timely manner. The county auditor shall review and consider the findings and recommendations of, and the sheriff's responses to, these reports when planning the auditor's annual work program for the review of the council, and shall conduct audits of internal investigation and complaint resolution operations as mandated in the auditor's annual work program. The auditor's independent authority to audit the sheriff's office shall not be replaced or otherwise affected by the creation of any audit or similar function within the sheriff's office.

E. To accomplish the purposes of this section, the auditor shall either hire qualified personnel with expertise in law enforcement oversight or contract for independent consulting services with appropriate expertise, or both. (15611 § 10, 2006).

2.20.040 Scope of authority.

A. The county auditor shall conduct performance audits, financial audits and special studies at the request of the county council. In the course of performing this work, the auditor shall have full and unrestricted access to and authority to examine any and all property and records contained in any form that are related to the financial and operational matters of any department, agency, program or other entity that receives appropriations or funding of any type from the county.

B. Officers and employees of any organization under review by the auditor shall furnish or provide access to requested records or property to enable the auditor to conduct the audit or otherwise perform audit duties. If the officers and employees fail to produce or provide access to the records or property, the auditor, upon approval by the council, may issue a subpoena compelling access. All records requested by the auditor shall be provided without charge.

C. The auditor shall have full access to officers and employees who may have custody of or access to records or property and to question them regarding their knowledge of the financial and operational matters under review. Those persons shall fully cooperate with the auditor and make full disclosure of all pertinent information. If they refuse to provide the requested information, the auditor may summon them to appear before the auditor and question them, under an oath administered by the auditor, concerning the financial and operational matters under review.

D. The county auditor also may perform the following functions:

1. To determine if legislative laws, policies and regulations are being faithfully, efficiently and effectively implemented by county officials;
2. To determine whether county agencies or programs are achieving their desired results
3. To review both the management and accounting control systems to determine whether the systems are adequate and effective in accomplishing their objectives;
4. To hold accountable county officials in their use of public funds and other resources at their disposal;
5. To determine if there have been abuses of discretion, arbitrary actions or errors of judgment, and be alert for indications of fraudulent behavior;
6. To determine if financial or other reports disclose fairly and fully all information required by law that is necessary to ascertain the nature and scope of programs and activities and to evaluate program activities;
7. To submit reports to the council resulting from performance or financial audits or special studies;
8. To give information to the county council when requested upon any subject relating to the financial affairs, operations, or performance of the county; and
9. To encourage due diligence by county officials. (Ord. 15241 § 5, 2005: Ord. 1565 § 1, 1973).

2.20.042 Audit standards and quality assurance.

A. Performance audits and financial audits performed under this chapter shall follow applicable generally accepted government auditing standards as promulgated by the United States Government Accountability Office and other applicable professional standards. Follow-up studies and special studies performed under this chapter shall follow the general standards section of those standards, with the type and extent of the internal quality review to be based on what is most appropriate for the project. All other types of studies performed under this chapter shall employ those audit standards and policies and procedures considered to be necessary and relevant to the type of study being conducted, in order to ensure professional objectivity, thoroughness and quality.

B. The auditor's office shall undergo an external quality control peer review every three years as prescribed in the government auditing standards. (Ord 15241 § 6, 2005).

2.20.045 Audit work program.

A. The council shall review and approve annually by motion a work program prepared by the auditor for the auditor’s office. The work program shall include the various types of performance and other audits and any recommended special studies to be conducted and managed by the auditor. It shall also include any objective, independent analytical oversight work directed by the council that would fall outside of the regular definition of an audit or special study.

B. The council may move to amend the approved annual work plan to meet special circumstances as they may arise. However, no council-initiated change to the work plan shall be made that adversely affects an audit or study in progress without the recommendation of the auditor.

C. If the auditor determines that there is serious concern regarding fraud, abuse or illegality, or that the scope of an audit or study in progress should be expanded as the result of any findings, the auditor may initiate spontaneously and conduct, or expand the scope of, an audit beyond that approved in the work program. The auditor shall notify the council of the change. (Ord. 15241 § 7, 2005: Ord. 8264 § 5, 1987). 

2.20.050 Reporting of formal audits.

A. Results of completed audits shall be communicated by the auditor in a written report, which may include either a formal written audit report or a management letter.

B. The report shall identify operational, managerial, financial, performance and policy matters that need to be addressed by county officials and management.

C. The auditor shall provide a draft of the audit for technical review of factual content by the director or other official who has authority over the department, agency or program under review.

D. With technical changes incorporated, the auditor shall transmit a proposed final report to the agency. The elected official presiding over the agency shall provide a formal written response to the auditor within fourteen calendar days after receipt of the proposed final audit report. The written response shall indicate:

1. Concurrence, partial concurrence or nonconcurrence with audit recommendations, including any explanation of why full concurrence may not be feasible; and
2. Actions that will be taken to implement the recommendations and to correct deficiencies cited.

The agency shall also establish a timeline for implementing the audit recommendations or alternate corrective actions.

E. The final audit report shall include the formal agency response. The auditor may add comments to the final audit report based on the nature of the agency response. If an agency response is not transmitted to the auditor, the auditor shall note this and the reason, if known. The auditor's office shall present the final report to the council or a designated council committee within thirty calendar days of completing the final report. If a presentation is not scheduled within that thirty-day period, the auditor's office, at the auditor's discretion, shall publish the final audit report.

F. The council shall designate a committee to receive and review all audits and special studies.  That committee shall also be charged with providing on-going oversight for the performance of the office including the development of the work program.

G. After the release of the audit to the council, the auditor shall file a copy as matter of public record with the records, elections and licensing services division of the department of executive services. (Ord. 15241 § 8, 2005: Ord. 8264 § 6, 1987: Ord. 1193 § 1, 1972: Ord. 682, 1971: Ord. 394 § 5, 1970).

2.20.055 Performance measurement and reporting. The county auditor may provide oversight, including technical assistance, to county departments, agencies and programs in the development and reporting of strategic plans, business plans, performance measures and other performance improvement efforts as directed by the council. (Ord. 15241 § 9, 2005).

2.20.070 Violation enjoinment. Notwithstanding the existence or use of any other remedy, the county auditor may seek regular or equitable relief to enjoin any acts or practices and abate any conditions which constitute or will constitute a violation of this code or other regulations herein adopted. (Ord. 1565 § 3, 1973).

2.20.080 Staff. The auditor, with consultation of the council, may employ staff assistants, clerical personnel or use of services of public accounting firms or consultants as may be necessary for conduct of the auditor’s office. (Ord. 15241 § 11, 2005: Ord. 1565 § 4, 1973).

 

 

 

 

Updated: 10/31/07

Auditor's Home | Audit Reports | Contact Us | Links to Audit Related Sites

King County | News | Services | Comments | Search

Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County.
By visiting this and other King County web pages,
you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site.
The details.