King County Parks: The County is faced with the challenges of maintaining its infrastructure, developing community parks in unincorporated areas, and developing parks and trails of regional significance during times when there are reduced resources available to undertake these activities. In 1996, the Council adopted the Parks, Recreational and Open Space Plan (Parks plan). The Parks Plan provides a broad framework for making both operating and capital funding decisions. The capital priorities, as outlined by the Parks Plan, are: Ballfield Initiative The 2000 Parks CIP continues the significant focus initiated in 1998 on increasing the athletic recreational opportunities available to King County residents. Within the 2000 CIP, over $6.2 million in new bond funding is allocated to ballfield projects aimed at increasing the playing capacity within the County. New development or rehabilitation is planned for several sites including: Marymoor, Fort Dent, Highline, Ravensdale, and Tahoma. The table below details increases in ballfields and playing capacity as accomplished in 1998 and 1999 and planned over the remaining five years of the initiative.
Park Land Acquisition The 2000 Parks CIP includes funding for several key acquisitions of park and open space lands. Funding is included for the purchase of property for a regional park at the south end of Lake Sawyer, which was included in the Critical Open Space Linkage program adopted in 1997. Roughly $5 million was spent by the County to acquire the first piece of this property in 1999. Payments in 2000 and 2001 will complete the purchase. Acquisition funds are also provided for the East Auburn Ballfields and a final connecting piece of the West Sammamish Trail. East Lake Sammamish Trail In 1999, the County purchased a closed rail line along the eastern bank of Lake Sammamish for roughly $3 million. Since the purchase, Parks has drafted an Interim Use and Resource Protection Plan that recommends limited interim trail use while the master planning process is completed. For 2000 the Adopted CIP Budget includes $1.46 million in grant-funded design expenditures. Preston Vision The 2000 Parks CIP also includes a funding commitment for preservation of park and open space lands in Preston. $650,000 is proposed to complete acquisition of the Preston Athletic Fields, which is a component of the Ballfield Initiative. $390,000 is included toward the final purchase of a site to be developed, operated and maintained by the Preston Arboretum and Botanical Garden, a local private non-profit. In 2000 a second installment of $250,000 is proposed to assist in the limited fee interest of the 473 acre Mitchell Hill Connector. This property is being preserved through the innovative Transfer of Development Rights Program in partnership with the City of Issaquah. This action will protect a highly threatened rural forest that drains into Issaquah Creek and will preserve a regional wildlife corridor. It will also provide for a soft surfaced trail, and link over 2,000 acres of public lands. The following table displays major projects in the 2000 Adopted Budget. Please see separate 2000 Adopted Capital Improvement Program Budget Book for more information.
Council Adopted Budget: There were no changes to the projects listed in the table above. However, seven relatively small projects were reduced or deleted while twelve projects had increased budget authority. See the CIP program budget book for a detailed list of all projects. The 1% for Art Program Annual appropriation to the Public Art Fund is used to support the Public Art Program in order to ensure that the works and thinking of visual artists are included in the planning, design and construction of county facilities, buildings and public spaces. All Capital Improvement Projects that are visible, publicly accessible, or for which there is a need for mitigation, contribute to the fund. The appropriation for 1% for Art Fund is the result of calculating 1% of eligible capital costs. The Public Art Program Plan, which reflects the 2000 Budget, describes the art projects to be initiated from the fund, recommends a budget for each art project, and identifies any special project categories to allow for program flexibility and responsiveness. This Plan will be transmitted shortly after the start of 2000. Stadium Maintenance and Rehabilitation. With the Stadium scheduled to be imploded in early 2000, there is no 2000 Stadium capital budget; furthermore, the Kingdome capital money spent in 1998 and 1999 was for the completion of capital projects designed to:
Any Stadium capital funds remaining following the Kingdome’s last year of operation, in 1999, will be returned to the Stadium Operating fund to be transferred to the Current Expense Fund. Transportation Program Please see the 2000 Adopted CIP Book for details. Airport Capital Improvement Program Prioritization for Airport construction projects is generally determined in accordance with the Airport Master Plan; priority is given to projects that are necessary for the continued safe operations of the Airport. The Airport’s CIP total request for the year 2000 is $ 3,560,175. Of this amount, $ 2,743,299 represents new projects, and $816,876 is for three continuing projects (Runway 13 Overlay, Noise Study Ordinance, So. Taxiway Overlay). The following table displays the major projects proposed in the 2000 budget. More detailed information can be found in the 2000 Adopted Capital Improvement Program Budget Book.
Council Adopted Budget: No Changes Roads Capital Improvement Program The continuing goal of the Road Services Division’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is to provide timely and efficient transportation improvements to the public. Transportation improvement plans are designed to ensure road safety, correspond to land use plans, and meet identified transportation needs. The Road Services Division uses the most recent population and employment forecasts in the development of this six-year program. In some cases, project scope adjustments have been made to enhance design efficiency or phase capacity increases to correspond to employment or population shifts. The Roads CIP totals $294 million for the 2000-2005 six-year period, including a 2000 new appropriation of $60.3 million. The road and bridge improvements reflected in this program, are consistent with the principles and policies of the adopted King County Comprehensive Plan. 2000 Program Highlights In 2000, the Roads CIP builds upon the flexible response budgeting policies adopted in 1998 by accelerating implementation of a broader range of projects within the first three years of the program, while remaining balanced over the six-year life of the program. Short-term borrowing may be necessary in order to accomplish this program acceleration. This proposal is a high priority of the Executive and responds to the Council Auditor’s 1996 Roads CIP Management Audit recommendations to pursue changes in budgeting practice in order to increase the overall level of CIP productivity and expend cash more effectively. In order to execute contracts for project design and construction, the full phase of a project is appropriated in the first year of anticipated expenditures. In past years, the amount of anticipated revenue on an annual basis was a key factor in establishing budget appropriation levels. Given recent product delivery increases, the budget authority levels established primarily by revenue availability no longer reflect the most aggressive programming capable by the Division. By establishing higher levels of budget authority in the early years of the six-year CIP, the Division will be in a position to implement projects that would normally have waited for funding in a subsequent year. Effect on Cash Management The aggressive program delivery reflected in flexible response budgeting will require greater diligence in cash management. The Division has implemented new procedures for tracking and reporting expenditure projections. Based on current projections, it is anticipated that the fund may require short term borrowing in 2001. Roads CIP Grant Contingency Project Included in the 2000 fund appropriation is $5 million to cover potential contingent grant sources that may be programmed if a grant eligible project is substituted into the program. Any unprogrammed grant supported appropriation will be disappropriated at year-end in order not to add to the budget carryover.
Criteria for Project Prioritization There are two primary prioritization processes that provide input to the CIP: the Bridge Priority Process, and the Transportation Needs Report (TNR). The Bridge Report is updated annually and submitted to the Council for review. This report includes the prioritized list of County bridges for replacement or rehabilitation. The criteria used to evaluate priority include sufficiency rating, seismic rating, geometrics, hydraulics, load limits, traffic safety, serviceability, importance, useful life, and structural concern. The TNR is also updated and submitted to the Council for their review and adoption as the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan annual update. The TNR Priority Process scores and ranks all King County road projects for consideration in the CIP. There are three major steps in the TNR Priority Process: The first step is the identification and screening of potential needs. Proposed projects are compiled from various sources and then screened to eliminate proposals that are non-capital in nature, infeasible or inappropriate because they conflict with County policies. The second step is a technical evaluation and ranking of all eligible projects. The projects are evaluated on the basis of twenty relevant criteria. A series of rankings and weights are used to develop individual project scores. The third and final step is an evaluation of non-quantifiable factors to incorporate important considerations, which cannot be measured such as emergencies, project scheduling, categorical funding and commitments with other jurisdictions. In the process of developing the six-year road construction program, the Transportation Needs Report and the Bridge Priority Process Report are duly considered. Growth Management/ Comprehensive Plan Issues The County is required by the Growth Management Act and by the Comprehensive Plan to specify transportation levels of service and enforce them through a concurrency management system. This policy ensures that new growth is concurrent with appropriate transportation improvements. The Comprehensive Plan has established five areas of the County with each having a unique service/financing and transportation service strategy. The areas range from the dense activity centers and mature residential communities to the rural areas. The Comprehensive Plan helps direct the use of County funds to areas where growth should occur based on the land use vision of the Plan. The Transportation Concurrency Management program is a key tool used by the County to ensure that transportation improvements are consistent with the goals established in the Comprehensive Plan. Applications for development permits must obtain a certificate of transportation concurrency (or capacity availability) prior to applying for a building permit. The certificate confirms and establishes the availability of transportation facilities to serve the development and commits the capacity to the development. A transportation concurrency certificate is not issued if the development causes a violation of transportation level of service and there is no financial commitment in place to complete the improvements within six years. The Comprehensive Plan also distinguishes between building new capacity projects for existing and pipeline development (vested in permitting), and those projects needed to serve only new growth. The Transportation Service strategy in the Plan prioritizes existing and pipeline needs before new growth needs. The development of the 2000-2005 Capital Improvement Program has evaluated projects for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and for meeting concurrency. Adjustments to project priorities, scopes, phasing, and costs, as well as new projects have been incorporated. Financial Planning and Policy Overview The six-year capital improvement program is primarily financed by the contribution from the County Road Fund (Fund 103), the $15 vehicle license fee, various State and Federal transportation grants, and developer mitigation payments. The contribution from the County Road Fund accounts for approximately 48% of the revenues supporting the six-year CIP. The Division has continued the efforts to examine potential savings as a result of efficiencies and increased productivity. The following table displays major projects proposed in the 2000 Budget. Please see separate 2000 Adopted Capital Improvement Program Budget Book for more information.
Council Adopted Budget: The Council modified the proposed Roads Capital Improvement Program to 1.) include budget authority corresponding to inclusion of Vehicle License Fee revenue, 2.) exclude budget authority due to Initiative 695 revenue decreases, 3.) postpone 2001-2003 project budget authority that had been proposed for acceleration according to a revenue shift from the out-years of the six year plan, and 4.) add an Issaquah Bypass budget amount of $4,000,000 in 2000 with corresponding offsets in the form of budget reductions, budget deferrals, and revenue transfers. Though the adopted budget amount in 2000 was nearly equal to the proposed amount the net impact over the six year period ending in 2005 was a $30 million reduction from the $293 million proposed budget. Public Transportation Fund Capital Improvement Program (Please note that changes made between the Executive Adopted and Council Adopted Budget are denoted in underlined italics.) The Adopted Public Transportation Capital Improvement Program (CIP) allocates approximately 75% of the total amount for replacement and maintenance of existing fleet and facilities. New initiatives included in the program include: Purchase of On-line Performance Module for the Scheduling System; Marion Street Pedestrian Bridge; Accessible Taxicabs; Transit Security Enhancements; Tashiro-Kaplan Sidewalk Repairs; and Broad Street Substation Lease Renewal. Major Program Highlights and Issues: Several issues surround the 2000-2005 Public Transportation Fund Capital Improvement Program:
For example, the original proposal included funds to expand capacity at the existing Federal Way park & ride lot. In working with the City of Federal Way, The State DOT and Sound Transit, it has now been determined that expansion at the existing lot is not the best solution for the area. As a result, the 2000 CIP includes the Federal Way park & ride lot as a new lot located in the vicinity of 272nd and Pacific Highway South. Future lot expansion is projected in the most heavily used commuter corridors – South I-5; I-405 North and East I-90. The current financial plan includes grant and local funding for these projects. The use of long-term debt is not assumed to finance these projects.
Consideration is currently being given to the creation of a TOD revolving fund that would collect revenue generated through TOD efforts. These funds would be used in support of TOD projects and could be used to offset costs of projects that would not otherwise be a net benefit to the PTF.
program assumed that some Breda coaches would need to be retained in order to support joint operation in the tunnel. Since that is no longer an option, it allows the entire Breda fleet to be replaced in fall, 2004. Smart Growth and Regional Arterial Network: The public transportation program is an integral part of the Executive initiatives for Smart Growth and the Regional Arterial Network. The Adopted CIP has a number of projects that support these initiatives, including:
2000 Program Highlights The following table displays major projects Adopted in the 2000 Budget. Please see separate 2000 Executive Adopted Capital Improvement Program Budget Book for more information.
During 2000, the Public Transportation Fund Capital Program will provide funding to complete the following major activities:
Revenue Fleet Replacement Capital Sub-Fund The Revenue Fleet Replacement Sub-Fund (RFRF) was created in 1997 to accumulate a fund balance sufficient to fund replacement of the Revenue Vehicle Fleet. The RFRF is proposed to act as a cash reserve for the replacement of coaches and Paratransit vans. The RFRF collects revenue from various sources, predominantly sales tax, and disburses these funds to the Capital Program at the time of fleet replacement. The expenditures for fleet occur as part of the Capital Program. Council Adopted Budget: The Initiative 695 reductions to Motor Vehicle Excise Tax revenue resulted in a $101 million reduction to the $280 million capital program proposed budget for 2000. Nearly half of the program reduction took the form of a $43 million reduction to Operating Facility Capacity project. The total reduction over the 2000-2005 six year plan amounted to $259 million. Over half of the six-year reduction amount is represented in three projects: Operating Facility Capacity project ($66 million); 40-Foot Diesel Buses ($44 million); and 60-Foot Articulated Buses ($52 million).
Updated: June 28, 2000 King County | News | Services | Comments | Search Links to external sites do not constitute
endorsements by King County. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||