King County Local Voters Pamphlet
September 19, 2000 Primary Election Highline School Dist. No. 401 - Proposition No. 1
PROPOSITION NO. 1 The Board of Directors of Highline School District No. 401 adopted Resolution No. 1062, concerning a proposition to finance and construct school capital facilities improvements. This proposition would authorize the District to construct and equip new school facilities, modernize and renovate existing school facilities and carry out other capital purposes; issue no more than $297,500,000 of general obligation bonds maturing within 20 years; and levy annual excess property taxes to pay and retire such bonds, all as provided in Resolution No. 1062. Should this proposition be: Approved __ Rejected __
Highline School District is requesting voters to approve a Capital Facilities Improvement Bond issue for the replacement and upgrading of seventeen District facilities with an average age exceeding 40 years. The District's Capital Facilities Improvement Plan identified the neediest schools. The adoption of the District's five-year Strategic Plan, the increased number of costly emergency repairs to aging buildings, the institution of new educational programs, and the recommendation of a Citizens' Bond Advisory Committee all contributed to validating the plan and setting the bond amount. The schools to be improved are located throughout the District. Bond proceeds will construct classrooms, libraries, gymnasiums, multi-purpose rooms, and support areas. Health and safety improvements, telecommunications and computer technology improvements, and upgrades to Memorial Field will be included. Without voter approval, there would be no funds to pay for the intended improvements to school facilities. As a result, the needed school improvements would not be possible. Failure to approve the $297,500,000 bond would result in the loss of an estimated additional $58,000,000 of state matching funds to the District. The bonds would mature within 20 years after the date of issue. They would be paid by annual property taxes in excess of regular property taxes, estimated increase to be $1.99 per $1,000 of assessed valuation or $298.50 per year for a $150,000 house. Exemptions from taxes for the bonds may be available to homeowners who are 61 years of age or older, or are disabled, and who meet income requirements set by state law.
The Highline School District is at a difficult crossroad. While our academic scores have improved, our schools, many built in the 1950's to accommodate the baby boom, have deteriorated. To continue the educational excellence that is vital to the future of our children and community, we need to step up to the basic needs of our aging schools. The last time we voted to repair schools was in 1986. Since 1998, the district has spent more than $10 million dollars to remove asbestos and mold, repair sewer lines, and patch leaking roofs in school buildings originally designed to last only 20 years. Our children deserve far better - a safe and healthy environment in which to learn. The school board, after extensive citizen input, voted unanimously to support a $297.5 million bond to rebuild 10 schools, upgrade 6 more, renovate the stadium that is shared by all the high schools, and to create a $6 million maintenance fund for future emergency repairs. Quality schools are the cornerstone for safe and desirable neighborhoods. A YES vote safeguards your home value and invests in education. If this were your house, you'd fix it. These are our schools, let's do the same. STATEMENT PREPARED BY: MEG VAN WYK, DIANE BRISSENDEN, RITA CREIGHTON
Arguments against this bond are the same that have been used every year. We appreciate the concerns with increased taxes: we also pay them. But 14 years without passing a bond is costing the District instructional money. We're not asking for fancy computers on every desk, just 80 fewer portables. It's not about posh classrooms, just healthy, safe schools for our kids. That's what this bond will get you. Please vote to fix our schools.
Reject this bond and send it back to the District for justification. You must ask, "Can we trust District leaders who hired a consultant at $15,500/month to flimflam voters into supporting a twenty-year $297,500,000 wish list?" Confidence in the District is poor at best. Historically, the District has been irresponsible in maintaining facilities. Should we trust them to responsibly manage such an enormous twenty-year debt paid with our hard-earned dollars? This bond increases capacity of thirteen elementary schools nearly fifty percent. Families are having fewer children. More families are opting for private schools and home schooling. Both have brought declining enrollment. The added capacity clearly demonstrates inept management. This bond overlaps our current bond, which includes the white-elephant Performing Arts Center. And, this nearly $300,000,000 bond is only half of the District's list of wants to spend a total exceeding $600,000,000. This bond calls for a whopping fifty-one percent hike in school taxes. These new taxes, plus rising assessments on property, increase rents and force up the cost of home ownership. Reject this multi-million dollar flimflam proposition and send it back to the District for a reasonable proposal. Vote NO in the September 19 primary. STATEMENT PREPARED BY: PAUL WILLOUGHBY, JOAN MONTEITH, JOE COOMER
This proposal calls for construction far in excess needed for declining enrollments. This proposal increases school taxes more than fifty percent. The average homeowner will pay an additional $318.80 per year. This twenty-year, debt-laden proposal will put an enormous burden on young families and force some seniors to take tax deferrals, putting liens against their estates. This proposal makes clear the district suffers from inept management. Send it back for justification. Vote NO.
|
NOTE: The Division of Records and Elections is not authorized to edit statements, nor is it responsible for their contents.
Updated: September 5, 2000
King County | Elections Section | News | Services | Comments | Search
Page 4.
Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County.
By visiting this and other King County web pages,
you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site.
The details.