Endangered Species Act home | What King County is doing for salmon
What you can do for salmon | Resources & background information
Salmon Information Center (external link)
Home & garden tips
Tri-County ESA Response
Convening Vision Statement & Principles for the Central Puget Sound ESA Response
June 15, 1998
Our Vision - Act cooperatively to develop a responsible, comprehensive, science based
recovery plan, providing a credible response to federal ESA listings of
Puget Sound Chinook salmon.
Our Goal - Restore and maintain healthy salmon populations and
protect the estuaries, rivers and streams on which they rely, based on
the best available science.
Salmon are an integral part of the region’s history, culture,
environment, and economy. Their need for clean, abundant, cool water,
must not be overlooked as population and economic growth continue.
Our Challenge
A proposed federal listing of Puget Sound Chinook under the Endangered
Species Act challenges this region to reverse trends that threaten or
endanger the existence of our native salmon. We must meet this
challenge in harmony with our population growth and economic prosperity.
What We Must Do
We must be willing to work together to explore ways to help salmon
recover and to resolve water resource conflicts. Water that flows from
the Cascades to Puget Sound is affected by land uses from within many
political boundaries and is be shared in many, sometimes conflicting,
ways. Unfortunately, this can affect the quality, quantity and habitat
conditions needed for salmon to survive. Therefore, we must:
-
Reach for a better understanding of all water resource
interests, especially the needs and life cycle of salmon;
-
Avoid economic disruption to the greatest extent practical,
assure adequate water supplies, and better manage the public’s
precious water resources; and,
-
Develop and implement a salmon recovery strategy in response
to any proposed listing under the Endangered Species Act based on
partnership between governments, tribes, economic interests, and
the general public.
Why Should We Work Together?
-
We need to determine our own future.
If we do not act to save our salmon then we will be depending on the
federal government and federal courts to decide the future not only
of salmon but also of our watersheds and the communities that live
within them.
-
We must make tough choices.
Changes are needed to result in improvement to salmon habitat.
Areas for improvement include how we use our water, where we build
our homes, how we harvest our timber and how we farm. We are also
going to have to change how we manage our salmon.
-
We must undertake significant effort and provide adequate funding.
It is going to take a lot of hard work to restore our salmon. The
kinds of change that are needed can not happen without extraordinary
efforts. In addition, saving our salmon will not be free. Protecting
and restoring salmon habitat will require substantial public and private
investments.
-
We are all in this together.
Saving our salmon is not about blaming anyone. We are all part of
the problem and we must all be part of the solution. Each of us must
come to understand the impacts we have on our salmon and the opportunities
we each have to contribute to their protection and restoration.
Guiding Principles to Shape Our Central Puget Sound ESA Response
-
Water supply, water quality and sustainable fisheries are inseparable
shared interests of Washington citizens. Salmon are valuable to our
state’s quality of life, and therefore salmon protection is an inherent
aspect of accommodating population and economic growth.
-
The region is best served if water supply, water quality and
fisheries are enhanced through a cooperative, collaborative process that
reduces conflicts through better understanding of each interest. We
all benefit from a constructive approach to the complex maze of
regulations, laws, and court decisions that could reinforce conflicts
between interests.
-
Providing water for fish and people is best achieved through
coordination of programs and financial resources of local, state,
federal, and tribal governments. We want to ensure that local
taxpayers and ratepayers share equitably in the cost of the
ESA response.
-
Our response to the ESA listing of Chinook salmon will support the
net gain in overall production of salmon to assure a long-term,
harvestable fishery.
Principles to Form a Regional Partnership
Our success is determined by the strength of our partnership
between state, tribal, local and federal governments and private
sector interests. Therefore, we must:
-
Invite all levels of government and non-government stakeholders to
participate in a coordinated effort.
-
Ensure effective implementation of initiatives in partnership
with the executive and legislative branches of state government.
-
Use local governments to play a central role in coordinating,
implementing and monitoring local, regional, and public-private
resource protection efforts.
-
Recognize the current responsibilities and obligations of different
governments and stakeholders.
-
Secure consensus on the size of investments needed, how the costs
should be allocated, and long-term commitment of various sectors and
interests.
-
Educate policy-makers, opinion leaders, state and local
officials and all citizens of the State will be vital to the
success of the strategy.
-
Include statewide and locally driven strategies and initiatives done in
partnership with tribes, private and public interests.
Principles to Develop Our Response Strategy
-
The strategy must be comprehensive, long-range, and action oriented. This means it must be based on best available science; set priorities; and be adaptive in response to ongoing data collection, monitoring, and review.
-
The strategy must recognize local watershed initiatives and develop linkages between such efforts. This means to implement solutions at the local level and:
- Seek ways to use limited resources effectively in meeting water resource needs.
- Avoid actions that require expenditure of resources on programs and projects that do not address priority needs.
- Build on existing, successful programs to address priorities without creating new layers of government and bureaucracy.
- The strategy must avoid inflexible region-wide mandates and standards
that might impede unique local programs; include regulatory and non-regulatory
approaches; and enable us to maintain a healthy economy.
-
The strategy must take full advantage of existing state and
local authorities, tools and programs in support of immediate action
to restore salmon. It should build on existing laws, regulations and
programs that make a contribution to salmonid protection and restoration.
- The successful strategy should reduce the risk of unnecessary federal
intervention.
Updated: June 29, 1998
Endangered Species Act home
What King County is doing for salmon
What you can do for salmon | Resources & background information
Salmon Information Center (external link)
Home & garden tips
King County |
Executive |
News |
Services |
Comments |
Search
Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages,
you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site.
The details.
|