|
“The King County Commission on Governance
will take the most comprehensive look at the basic structure of county
government since the passage of the King County Charter in 1968,” said
Councilmember Julia Patterson,
the prime sponsor of the measure. “The operation of all three branches
is on the table because all are affected by the current budget crisis
facing King County.”
King County is currently facing a $52
million deficit for 2003 and a shortfall of $110 million through 2005.
Potential cuts to the county’s current expense budget will have an
impact on all three branches of county government.
Councilmember Patterson, Council Chair Cynthia
Sullivan and Councilmember Kathy
Lambert were joined by County Executive Ron Sims, King County
Prosecuting Attorney Norm Maleng, and Judge Richard D. Eadie, Presiding
Judge, King County Superior Court in announcing the ordinance that will be
sent to the Council’s Committee-of-the-Whole establishing the
commission.
|

King County Councilmembers (left to right)
Julia Patterson, Rob McKenna, Judge Eadie, Council Chair Cynthia Sullivan,
Councilmember Kathy Lambert, Executive Ron Sims and Prosecuting Attorney
Norm Maleng attended a press conference to announce the creation of a
special commission to look into the structure of King County.
|
|
“King County’s financial situation is
prompting the Council and the Executive to re-engineer county government,”
said Council Chair Cynthia Sullivan. “Although the proposal to reduce
the size of the council may have been motivated by mischief, it has
provided the context for a meaningful dialogue to ensure that the proper
leadership structure is in place within all facets of an evolving
government.”
“In 1968, King County residents had the
courage to say their current system of governance wasn’t working and
that it was time to make a change,” said County Executive Ron Sims. “Thirty-four
years later, we are facing a similar crossroads. Much like the freeholders
who crafted the original charter, we are asking the members of this
commission on governance to work on potential changes to meet the
challenges of this generation.”
The purpose of the commission is to study
and assess the current structure of King County Government and make
recommendations to the executive and the council on:
- Examining current expense (general fund)
expenditures.
- Changing the county’s revenue
structure—if there is a need to make changes to the current expense fund
revenue structure.
- Deciding if there should be a dedicated
revenue source for the criminal justice system, including funding for
human services programs that reduce recidivism.
- Modifying or repealing existing
employment policies.
- Determining if elected county officials
should be partisan or non-partisan.
- Determining if county officials should
be elected or appointed.
- Potentially changing the size and
structure of King County government, including all elective county
offices.
- Potentially changing the size and
structure of the King County Council, including the number of
councilmembers, staffing and salaries.
"This commission will help us
restructure all the operations of county government. It is similar
to when we reduced the need for additional facilities and lowered
costs by creating and implementing the criminal Juvenile Justice
Operational Master Plan," said Councilmember Kathy Lambert.
"Just as then, a thorough examination of the system is the first
step, and everyone and everything will go under the
microscope."
“As one who has served King County for
more than 30 years, I am excited about the potential for the Governance
Commission to be the catalyst for long-term change,” said King County
Prosecuting Attorney Norm Maleng. “The commission is structured to allow
a full and frank discussion of the issues by citizens who do not work for
the county, but are motivated by an interest in good government.”
A selection committee will decide by
unanimous vote who the nine commission members will be. The selection
committee will be comprised of the executive, the chair of the council,
the prosecuting attorney and the presiding judge of the superior court.
Commission members will then be appointed by the executive and subject to
confirmation by the council. Commission members will decide for themselves
what the structure of the commission will be and how it will operate. No
elected official or individual running for office can be a member of the
commission. The commission will issue a final report and present its
recommendations to the council by July 1, 2003.
“Because funding sources that have
supported countywide services no longer are available, we absolutely must
look for new, creative options,” said Presiding King County Superior
Court Judge Richard D. Eadie. “I can't think of anything more important
at this time than to have a knowledgeable group of citizens do a critical
review and make recommendations for further streamlining of our
government.”
“Since this commission will be dealing
with some very difficult and challenging issues, we want it to be as
independent, as open, and as apolitical as possible,” said Patterson.
“We know there are no easy solutions to the budget crisis, but this
commission can be a strong first step in coming up with the answers to
help us restructure the system so it can continue to meet the needs of the
people of King County.”
|