![]()
| Product and recycled content | rubberized asphalt rubblizing technique |
| Application | resurfacing project replaces conventional asphalt overlays rubblizing re-uses existing pavement subgrade |
| Location/Date | East Lake Sammamish Parkway summer/fall, 1997 |
| Project manager/user | Luke Korpi, P.E., Engineer King County Department of Transportation Roads Division, (206)296-8760 |
| Architect/Engineer | Bill Oakes King County Department of Transportation Roads Division |
| General Contractor | Lakeside Industries, (425)313-2600 Bob Sturgis, Project Manager |
| Background, history | To determine differences in traffic noise associated with different paving types. |
| Performance | To date, no differences in performance or traffic noice characteristics. |
| Source of material | Rubberized Asphalt: Idaho Asphalt Supply, Post Falls, Idaho Rubblizing-uses on site material |
| Quantity | 1804 tons rubberized asphalt, covers 3600 lf of roadway Approximately 1100 cu. yds was "rubblized" covering 2500 lf of roadway |
| Cost | Rubberized Asphalt: $37.20/ton compared to conventional asphalt on same
project cost $27.60 ton Rubblizing concrete pavement cost $4.55 per sq. yd. |
| Cost savings or increase | Rubberized asphalt cost approximately 35% more than convewntional asphalt
on this project Rubblizing saved buying approximately 1100 cu. yds of virgin gravel or concrete materials |
| Installation, costs/savings | Not significant |
| Source of extra funds | N/A |
| Would you buy this product again? | Yes. |
| Why or why not? | Will continue to pursue use of rubberized asphalt on a trial basis. Rubblizing is an effective constreuction technique for certain site-specific conditions. |
| Comments | Traffic noise levels were monitored before and after the overlay. Results: to date, no differences in traffic noise have been observed between the different pavement types. Overall, noise was reduced by 2.6 - 4.8 decibels due to the overlay, but it was not dependent on pavement type |
E-mail
Return to
Environmental Purchasing Menu | Product
Experience List
Updated: October 23, 1998
King County
| News | Services | Comments | SearchLinks to external sites do not constitute
endorsements by King County.
By visiting this and other King County web pages,
you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site.
The details.